OpenAI to launch GPT 5 aka Orion soon, their most powerful, closest-to-AGI LLM yet

For example, you might input some text and get a generated essay. Another example would be that you enter text and get a generated artwork. Rumors were that GPT-4 would break the sound barrier, as it were, and provide a full multi-modal capability of everything to everything. The anticipation was that images or artwork would be added, along with audio, and possibly even video. Any mode on input, including as many of those modes as you desired. Plus any mode on output, including as many of the modes mixed as you might wish to have.

It will be different from GPT-4o and o1, and could be more powerful. But this GPT-5 candidate, reportedly called Orion, might not be available to regular users like you and me, at least not initially. The announcement also comes as the battle heats up among Big Tech giants to use generative AI technology to boost their search functions. At Tuesday’s event, Microsoft also revealed its closely anticipated announcement that its own search tool Bing will now use OpenAI’s technology to boost searches.

You can foun additiona information about ai customer service and artificial intelligence and NLP. We might become heavily dependent upon those firms and their wares. I believe that covers the first sentence of the TR and we can shift to additional topics. The thinking is that the public ought what is gpt-5 to know what is going on with AI, especially when AI gets bigger and has presumably the potential for eventually veering into the dire zone of existential risks, see my analysis at the link here.

Usually, the output is written in a tone and manner that suggests a surefire semblance of confidence. Assuming that you use generative AI regularly, it is easy to get lulled into seeing truthful material much of the time. You then can get readily fooled when something made-up gets plucked into the middle of what otherwise seems to be ChatGPT App an entirely sensible and fact-filled generated essay. Again, I don’t like the catchphrase, but it seems to have caught on. The mainstay of the issue with AI hallucinations is that they can produce outputs that contain very crazy stuff. You might be thinking that it is up to the user to discern whether the outputs are right or wrong.

Microsoft is touting “new Bing” as unlike any search engine currently available. The next-generation iteration of ChatGPT is advertised as being as big a jump as GPT-3 to GPT-4. The new version will purportedly provide a human-like AI experience, where you feel like you are talking to a person rather than a machine, as Readwrite reports. Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space. To close off this portion of the discussion for now, generative AI by all AI makers is confronting these issues.

Among other things, it will incorporate a chat function that will allow users to fine tune their searches, according to the company. Some users of ChatGPT have been surprised to sometimes have the AI app provide responses that seem perhaps overly humorous or overly terse. This can occur if the generative AI detects something in your input prompt that appears to trigger that kind of response. You might jokingly ask about something and not realize that this is going to then steer ChatGPT toward jokes and a lighthearted tone. Sometimes a blockbuster movie is known beforehand as likely going to be a blockbuster upon release.

OpenAI Academy launches to support developers using AI in low- and middle-income countries

In other cases, the film is a sleeper that catches the public by surprise and even the movie maker by surprise. You can think of generative AI as the auto-complete function when you are using a word processing package, though this is a much more encompassing and advanced capability. I’m sure you’ve started to write a sentence and have an auto-complete that recommended wording for the remainder of the sentence.

Other questions in the Reddit AMA revealed that OpenAI indeed has its hands full. Many other answers to questions revolved around features the company is actively working on for ChatGPT. There is also a subtle tendency to get lulled into believing the outputs of generative AI.

What’s under the hood of Microsoft’s ‘new Bing’? OpenAI CEO says it’s powered by ChatGPT and GPT-3.5

Many people that use ChatGPT do not realize the importance of setting the context when they first engage in a dialogue with the AI app. It can be a huge difference in terms of what response ChatGPT you will get. I often find that ChatGPT doesn’t hone very well on its own toward particular contexts. So far, GPT-4 seems to really shine through the use of contextual establishment.

• Then more recently, we got o1 (in preview) with more advanced reasoning capabilities.
• They tried to use various techniques and technologies to push back at outputting especially hateful and foul essays.
• Much of the rest of the AI industry was gobsmacked that ChatGPT managed to walk the tightrope of still producing foul outputs and yet not to the degree that public sentiment forced OpenAI to remove the AI app from overall access.

A related aspect is whether the generative AI is in real-time scanning the Internet and adjusting on-the-fly the computational pattern-matching. ChatGPT was limited to scans that took place no later than the year 2021. This means that when you use ChatGPT, there is pretty much no data about what happened in 2022 and 2023. Some people falsely assume that the entirety of the Internet was scanned to devise these generative AI capabilities.

OpenAI’s GPT-4 is now available with significant improvements from GPT-3.5

“We invite everyone to use Evals to test our models and submit the most interesting examples. We believe that Evals will be an integral part of the process for using and building on top of our models, and we welcome direct contributions, questions, and feedback,” OpenAI wrote. While there have been some improvements over the previous model, OpenAI admits that there are still similar limitations with the model as there were in the past. For example it has the potential to give wrong facts or make reasoning errors.

For example, I’ve discussed the Google unveiling of Bard and how the Internet search engine wars are heating up due to a desire to plug generative AI into conventional web searching, see the link here. OpenAI has already made waves with its rapid development of generative AI, releasing updated versions like GPT-4o and OpenAI o1 since the original GPT-4 launch in March 2024. Orion, however, is being positioned as a groundbreaking evolution, featuring potentially 1.5 trillion parameters — one of the largest LLMs ever developed.

Also, the claim is made that GPT-4 outdoes GPT-3.5 in terms of averting AI hallucinations, even though it makes clear that they still are going to occur. Returning back to the matter at hand, I earlier mentioned that AI hallucinations are a prevailing problem when it comes to generative AI. Fortunately, they have chosen the sensible approach of trying to get out there ahead of the backlashes and browbeating that usually goes with generative AI releases. They presumably are aiming to firmly showcase their seriousness and commitment to rooting out these issues and seeking to mitigate or resolve them. It would seem worthwhile to take a moment and acknowledge that OpenAI has made available their identification of how they are approaching these arduous challenges. You could say that there was no reason for them to have to do so.

You can ask the generative AI to explain what the picture seems to depict. All in all, the vision processing will be a notable addition. You can enter text and you will get outputted text, plus you can possibly enter an image at the input.

Eyes on the futureAt a recent AI summit, Meta’s chief AI scientist Yann LeCun remarked that even the most advanced models today don’t match the intelligence of a four-year-old. His comments highlight the challenges AI developers face in pushing the boundaries towards human-level intelligence. OpenAI, however, remains confident that GPT-5 will represent a significant leap forward.

When you use a generative AI app, you at times just leap into a conversation that you start and continue along with the AI. In other cases, you begin by telling the AI the context of the conversation. For example, I might start by telling the generative AI that I want to discuss car engines with the AI, and that I want the AI to pretend it is a car mechanic. This then sets the stage or setting for the AI to respond accordingly. Only the tech companies with the biggest bucks and the biggest resources will be able to devise and field generative AI. The reason that this is questioned is that perhaps we are going to have generative AI that is tightly controlled by only a handful of tech firms.

Entertainment

The reality is that many other akin AI apps have been devised, often in research labs or think tanks, and in some cases were gingerly made available to the public. People prodded and poked at the generative AI and managed to get essays of an atrocious nature, see my coverage at the link here. The AI makers in those cases were usually forced to withdraw the AI from the open marketplace and revert back to focusing on lab use or carefully chosen AI beta testers and developers. Some people go see the sequel and declare that it is as good if not even better than the original.

A concern here is that the outputs might contain made-up stuff that the user has no easy means of determining is made-up. They might believe the whole hog of whatever the output says. An ongoing and troubling problem underpinning generative AI, in general, is that all manner of unpleasant and outright disturbing outputs can be produced. The begging question that some express is that it sure would be nice to know exactly what they did in this rebuild. The TR and SC somewhat mention what took place, but not to any in-depth degree.

ChatGPT can now include web sources in responses

In the above-quoted sentence about GPT-4 from the TR, you might have observed the phrasing that it is a “large-scale” generative AI. Everyone would likely tend to vicariously agree, based on the relative sizes of generative AI systems of today. GPT-4 would be considered the successor or sequel to ChatGPT.

OpenAI, the trailblazing AI company behind ChatGPT, is reportedly gearing up to introduce its latest large language model (LLM), internally called Orion. Widely expected to debut as GPT-5, the new model could be a major leap towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). I would offer the additional thought that the field of AI all told is going to take a harsh beating if there isn’t an ongoing and strenuous effort to pursue these matters in a forthright and forthcoming manner. Taking a hidden black-box approach is bound to rise ire amid the public at large. The report notes Orion is 100 times more powerful than GPT-4, but it’s unclear what that means. It’s separate from the o1 version that OpenAI released in September, and it’s unclear whether o1’s capabilities will be integrated into Orion.

If you are looking for hard AI problems, I urge you to jump into these waters and help out. They insist that though many of the AI makers seem to be sharing what they are doing, this is somewhat of a sneaky form of plausible deniability. I’ve discussed this “wait until readied” ongoing controversy frequently in my column coverage.

A Step Closer to AGIWhile the world eagerly awaits the launch of GPT-5, reports indicate that the AI model is likely to arrive no sooner than early 2025. There was speculation about a December 2024 release, but a company spokesperson denied those rumours, possibly due to recent leadership changes within OpenAI, including the departure of former CTO Mira Murati. OpenAI wants to combine multiple LLMs in time to create a bigger model that might become the artificial general intelligence (AGI) product all AI companies want to develop. Whereas GPT-3 — the language model on which ChatGPT is built — has 175 billion parameters, GPT-4 is expected to have 100 trillion parameters. Microsoft said Bing was running on a “new next-generation language model,” but stopped short of calling it GPT-4.

When he’s not writing about the most recent tech news for BGR, he brings his entertainment expertise to Marvel’s Cinematic Universe and other blockbuster franchises. Insider’s Ashley Stewart previously reported that Microsoft was expected to reveal that Bing would be upgraded with OpenAI’s technology. The development marks a turning point for online searches, a feature of the Internet that’s “remained fundamentally the same since the last major inflection,” Mehdi said at Microsoft’s event at Redmond, Washington. The comments reveal the latest chapter of Microsoft’s partnership with OpenAI, which said last month that the tech giant would make a “multi-billion dollar investment” in OpenAI’s technology.

Whether GPT-4o, Advanced Voice Mode, o1/strawberry, Orion, GPT-5, or something else, OpenAI has no choice but to deliver. It can’t afford to fall behind too much, especially considering what happeend recently. Apparently, the point of o1 was, among other things, to train Orion with synthetic data. The Verge surfaced a mid-September tweet from Sam Altman that seemed to tease something big would happen in the winter. That supposedly coincided with OpenAI researchers celebrating the end of Orion’s training. Speaking of OpenAI partners, Apple integrated ChatGPT in iOS 18, though access to the chatbot is currently available only via the iOS 18.2 beta.

Up until then, prior efforts to release generative AI applications to the general public were typically met with disdain and outrage. A model designed for partnersOne interesting twist is that GPT-5 might not be available to the general public upon release. Instead, reports suggest it could be rolled out initially for OpenAI’s key partners, such as Microsoft, to power services like Copilot. This approach echoes how previous models like GPT-4o were handled, with enterprise solutions taking priority over consumer access. Regardless of what product names OpenAI chooses for future ChatGPT models, the next major update might be released by December.

Or they could just do some vague hand-waving and assert that they were doing a lot of clever stuff to deal with these issues. Nobody with a proper head on their shoulders thought that such a rumor could hold water. There is much yet to be done to contend with these enduring and exasperating difficulties. It is likely going to take a village to conquer the litany of AI Ethics issues enmeshed within the milieu of generative AI. Some rumors were that magically and miraculously GPT-4 was going to clean up and resolve all of those generative AI maladies.

BGR’s audience craves our industry-leading insights on the latest in tech and entertainment, as well as our authoritative and expansive reviews. Outside of work, you’ll catch him streaming almost every new movie and TV show release as soon as it’s available. Before this week’s report, we talked about ChatGPT Orion in early September, over a week before Altman’s tweet. At the time, The Information reported on internal OpenAI documents that brainstormed different subscription tiers for ChatGPT, including figures that went up to $2,000. As I said before, when looking at OpenAI ChatGPT development rumors, I’m certain that big upgrades will continue to drop.

Much of the rest of the AI industry was gobsmacked that ChatGPT managed to walk the tightrope of still producing foul outputs and yet not to the degree that public sentiment forced OpenAI to remove the AI app from overall access. I will describe herein the major features and capabilities of GPT-4, along with making comparisons to its predecessor ChatGPT (the initial “blockbuster” in my analogy). Sam Altman, OpenAI’s co-founder, has hinted that their upcoming model will mark a major milestone in AI development, though he admits there is still plenty of work to be done. With expectations running high, Orion could redefine the future of generative AI, paving the way for more sophisticated, human-like interactions. OpenAI’s ChatGPT created popular access to a type of technology that’s been long familiar to computer science and data analytics experts.

Thereafter, when a sequel is announced and being filmed, the anticipation can reach astronomical levels. Most people assumed the shock was the conversant capability. The surprise that floored nearly all AI insiders was that you could release generative AI that might spew out hateful speech and the backlash wasn’t fierce enough to force a quick retreat. Indeed, prior to the release of ChatGPT, the rumor mill was predicting that within a few days or weeks at the most, OpenAI would regret making the AI app readily available to all comers. They would have to restrict access or possibly walk it home and take a breather.

At the end of last year, I made my annual predictions about what we would see in AI advances for the year 2023 (see the link here). I had stated that multi-modal generative AI was going to be hot. “GPT-4 and successor models have the potential to significantly influence society in both beneficial and harmful ways. We are collaborating with external researchers to improve how we understand and assess potential impacts, as well as to build evaluations for dangerous capabilities that may emerge in future systems. We will soon share more of our thinking on the potential social and economic impacts of GPT-4 and other AI systems,” OpenAI wrote in a blog post. Some though have been handwringing in the AI community that this barely abides by the notion of multi-modal.